"Jane Eyre" - a novel, which has developed our grandmothers traditionally read in his youth every romantic lady. Mourned and stored in memory unshakable reminder of the vicissitudes of the female fate. The classic English novel by Charlotte Bronte does not lose its Relevance.

The history of the humble, plain, but independent governess It conquered the world in the XIX century. Weak in the physical and social sense, a woman is much more devastating circumstances in this case It remains true to its moral principles, even to the detriment of his personal Fortunately. "Little proud of Joan of Arc" - I nicknamed Jane Eyre as a famous writer, a contemporary Brontë Thackeray.

An orphan Jane Eyre, having gone through years of study at the school for the poor, arranged governess at the estate of Mr. Rochester. She takes care of education trust host, French and a little day by day hopelessly He falls in love with Rochester. It would seem that ugly girl is not the slightest a chance for personal happiness, but Rochester suddenly asks her to marry him married. That's just the wedding day offers well-kept secret - Rochester has long married, his legal wife crazy, but it can not change anything.

Jane leaves home and begins to arrange Rochester own life away from him. At this time, the crazy wife started the fire, leaving Rochester blind crippled widower. For which Jane Eyre now with a clear conscience, is getting married. End of story - some sad, It conjures up thoughts of women's victimhood congenital and acquired female pride, bordering on stupidity. This moment - a weak point of almost all critical articles and the subsequent release of the book adaptations.

To film "Jane Eyre" began almost a century ago, and not all paintings were created the home of Charlotte and Jane. First, in 1910, came out six US movies, then India, after him, in the middle of the century, contributed to the story "Jane Eyre" has made Brazil (remember, a few years ago one revision Russian newspaper was inundated with angry letters incredulous readers the journalist for mentioning "a Brazilian film" Jane Eyre "). UK thought of her immortal work only in 1956 hastily, with breaks in a few years, began to catch up - just British withdrew six of the same movie. In 1996 came the picture co-production of France, Italy and the UK.

Of the sixteen most noticeable two adaptations - series 1983 and 1996. They stubbornly divided between the championship, it is about them argue critics and fans of Jane Eyre over the world. Opinions are divided equally.

The series 1983 - a recognized classic of world cinema. AT Starring: Zela Clark and Timothy Dalton. According to the majority, Dalton - best cinematic incarnation Mr. Rochester. Charisma and charm the actor does not hold, especially since 1983 He became his career peak - the role of Rochester in "Jane Eyre" and the role of James Bond in the eponymous film.

1996 film with William Hurt and Charlotte in Gensburg Actors especially criticized for its choice of actor for the role of Mr. Rochester. Painfully he redhead, brunette on the rock was gone. What As for the main character, Jane Eyre from one series to another reincarnated from gray mouse in a hysterical and back. To catch the mood and difficult to understand Miss Eyre character - a difficult task, even when in the hands of the book, and not fantasy no holding back of the frame.

Both the film adaptation complement each other. Perhaps because, and that one, and the other has something to add. One thing is clear - the story of Jane Eyre far from being exhausted, the novel by Charlotte Bronte has not filmed in full as when there is nothing more to add, heroes in their places, and all the key highlights the work displayed.

I think that world cinema can still try to fix this is a misunderstanding. Especially soon tribute will pay homage to writer Hollywood - plans to withdraw biopic about Charlotte Bronte Michelle Williams in the title role. And then remember the filmmakers and the film adaptation of her best novel ...

Daria Petchorin