Civil marriage: Myths and Reality

Civil marriage: Myths and Reality
Nuances

civil marriage Actual or civil marriage - a subject of constant public debate. Many refuse to accept this form of relations, others consider a civil marriage refuge of losers, others, on the contrary, believe that true feelings do not need to register. With unofficial marriage is associated many myths, but he is terrible as he is painted?

History of the term

Originally called civil marriage marriage secular, that is not a church. In olden times, when religion played a huge role in the life of society, to decide on such a relationship it was not easy. Only the bravest challenged society and refused to wedding Wedding - it is worth it to hurry up? in favor of the regular registration with the authorities.

First of all there was a civil marriage in the Netherlands - at the end of the XVI century. Later, they picked up the baton France (end of the XVIII century), England (beginning XIX century) and Germany (the end of XIX century). The Russian civil marriage gained popularity only after the October Revolution.

Over time, the term "civil marriage" radically changed its meaning. So became known as the actual marriage, that is not registered in the relevant organs of the marital relationship. Other names such relationships - cohabitation, the actual marriage, informal marriage. Civil marriage is very common, but the attitude in society is quite ambiguous.

Myths and Reality

A very common view that civil marriage is beneficial only to those who wish to receive all the joys of family life, but at the same time remain free from any obligation. It is believed that such relationships are especially useful to men, often joke that men cohabiting feel free, while their girlfriends are sure that they are married. And ends a relationship that, after separation Parting: punctuation rules one spouse can not claim the property, which was acquired together.

Of course, this really happens. And very often, engaging in unregistered relationships, commitments are to avoid not only men but also women. But at the same time fewer people trying to avoid liability, even in marriage. Unfortunately, the laws are not always able to protect the interests of both spouses in a divorce, and a situation where the husband after the divorce (and often the wife) is with anything, there are too frequently.

Another common myth is the official marriage take only mature, responsible people, and therefore, such a relationship is stronger than unregistered. Just look at the statistics of divorce, to make it clear that the stamp of marriage can not be a guarantee of a long marriage. Regardless of how the decorated (and features if any) marriage, relationship building people, and therefore, the prospects of these relations depends on the nature of the spouses, their purpose and relationship to each other.

It is a mistake to believe that a civil marriage - a marriage "for fun." Unlike a trial marriage, real marriage people usually make a good long time, and examples of couples who have lived without registration for decades, quite a lot. Moreover, women in such marriages not necessarily feel unhappy - at least, Angelina Jolie, which only recently came out officially married to Brad Pitt, such is clearly not looked. At the same time it is not necessary to hope that if the relationship ends parting, in civil marriage it will experience less painful.

Many women believe that marriage stamp magically change her lover, making reveler in an exemplary family man, an alcoholic - in teetotaler and skuperdyaya - in a generous man. This is a very dangerous delusion inevitably leads to disappointment. It would be naive to believe that the certificate of marriage can change a person's character and his attitude to his wife: it is just paper, not a magic wand fairy fairies.

Pros and cons

The question whether to agree to a civil marriage, worries many women, especially the young. On the one hand, because there are millions of people in the European and American countries. In Latin America, where it is very difficult to obtain a divorce, nearly three quarters of all children born in unregistered marriages. On the other hand, the position of "civil" wife sees some tenuous, and the term "girlfriend" is associated with crime reports.

Favorite Male argues that civil marriage - it is modern and comfortable, and parents purses his lips and say that such relationships accept only those who do not take married. Who is listening? There is no universal solution, therefore, is only listen to themselves. If she thinks a civil marriage something shameful and humiliating her in any case it is not necessary to agree on a form of relationship that does not feel used. If the girl does not see anything wrong in the absence of a stamp and even finds some benefit in unregistered relationships, then why not? In the end, never change your mind and later to register the marriage.

Civil marriage is always more beneficial to partners. This option is worth considering the relationship in a situation when a loved one is prone to debt and to borrow recklessly. Civil marriages can be beneficial if the alleged relationship with the citizen of another country where according to the law of divorce procedure is accompanied by a big waste, and other complexities.

Registered marriage is beneficial to those who provided less. Furthermore, the presence of the marriage certificate may in some situations be very useful: for example, some banks can transfer money between accounts of spouses, without additional fees. Registration of children born in marriage, takes a minimum of time. In addition, the official marriage allows the wife to visit in jail or intensive care, although it is difficult to assume that it may be for someone serious argument in favor of marriage.